eprintid: 560 rev_number: 7 eprint_status: archive userid: 2 dir: disk0/00/00/05/60 datestamp: 2022-03-14 23:55:08 lastmod: 2022-03-15 23:55:08 status_changed: 2022-03-14 23:55:08 type: article metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Amado Diago, Carlos Antonio creators_name: Puente Maestu, Luis creators_name: Abascal Bolado, Beatriz creators_name: Agüero Calvo, Juan creators_name: Hernando Hernando, Mercedes creators_name: Puente Bats, Irene creators_name: Agüero Balbín, Ramón title: Translation and Validation of the Multidimensional Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire ispublished: pub subjects: uneat_bm divisions: uneatlantico_produccion_cientifica full_text_status: none keywords: Dyspnea; Dyspnea-12; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Validation; Spanish abstract: Introduction Dyspnea is a multidimensional symptom, but this multidimensionality is not considered in most dyspnea questionnaires. The Dyspnea-12 takes a multidimensional approach to the assessment of dyspnea, specifically the sensory and the affective response. The objective of this study was to translate into Spanish and validate the Dyspnea-12 questionnaire. Methods The original English version of the Dyspnea-12 questionnaire was translated into Spanish and backtranslated to analyze its equivalence. Comprehension of the text was verified by analyzing the responses of 10 patients. Reliability and validation of the questionnaire were studied in an independent group of COPD patients attending the pulmonology clinics of Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, diagnosed and categorized according to GOLD guidelines. Results The mean age of the group (n=51) was 65 years and mean FEV1 was 50%. All patients understood all questions of the translated version of Dyspnea-12. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was α=0.937 and intraclass correlation coefficient was =0.969; P<.001. Statistically significant correlations were found with HADS (anxiety r=0.608 and depression r=0.615), mMRC dyspnea (r=0.592), 6MWT (r=–0.445), FEV1 (r=–0.312), all dimensions of CRQ-SAS (dyspnea r=–0.626; fatigue r=–0.718; emotional function r=–0.663; mastery r=–0.740), CAT (r=0.669), and baseline dyspnea index (r=–0.615). Dyspnea-12 scores were 10.32 points higher in symptomatic GOLD groups (B and D) (P<.001). Conclusion The Spanish version of Dyspnea-12 is a valid and reliable instrument to study the multidimensional nature of dyspnea. date: 2018 publication: Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) volume: 54 number: 2 pagerange: 74-78 id_number: doi:10.1016/j.arbr.2017.08.015 refereed: TRUE issn: 15792129 official_url: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbr.2017.08.015 access: close language: en citation: Artículo Materias > Biomedicina Universidad Europea del Atlántico > Investigación > Producción Científica Cerrado Inglés Introduction Dyspnea is a multidimensional symptom, but this multidimensionality is not considered in most dyspnea questionnaires. The Dyspnea-12 takes a multidimensional approach to the assessment of dyspnea, specifically the sensory and the affective response. The objective of this study was to translate into Spanish and validate the Dyspnea-12 questionnaire. Methods The original English version of the Dyspnea-12 questionnaire was translated into Spanish and backtranslated to analyze its equivalence. Comprehension of the text was verified by analyzing the responses of 10 patients. Reliability and validation of the questionnaire were studied in an independent group of COPD patients attending the pulmonology clinics of Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, diagnosed and categorized according to GOLD guidelines. Results The mean age of the group (n=51) was 65 years and mean FEV1 was 50%. All patients understood all questions of the translated version of Dyspnea-12. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was α=0.937 and intraclass correlation coefficient was =0.969; P<.001. Statistically significant correlations were found with HADS (anxiety r=0.608 and depression r=0.615), mMRC dyspnea (r=0.592), 6MWT (r=–0.445), FEV1 (r=–0.312), all dimensions of CRQ-SAS (dyspnea r=–0.626; fatigue r=–0.718; emotional function r=–0.663; mastery r=–0.740), CAT (r=0.669), and baseline dyspnea index (r=–0.615). Dyspnea-12 scores were 10.32 points higher in symptomatic GOLD groups (B and D) (P<.001). Conclusion The Spanish version of Dyspnea-12 is a valid and reliable instrument to study the multidimensional nature of dyspnea. metadata Amado Diago, Carlos Antonio; Puente Maestu, Luis; Abascal Bolado, Beatriz; Agüero Calvo, Juan; Hernando Hernando, Mercedes; Puente Bats, Irene y Agüero Balbín, Ramón mail SIN ESPECIFICAR (2018) Translation and Validation of the Multidimensional Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire. Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition), 54 (2). pp. 74-78. ISSN 15792129