eprintid: 10380 rev_number: 6 eprint_status: archive userid: 2 dir: disk0/00/01/03/80 datestamp: 2024-01-09 23:30:15 lastmod: 2024-01-09 23:30:15 status_changed: 2024-01-09 23:30:15 type: article metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Uribarria, Héctor Gadea creators_name: Lago-Fuentes, Carlos creators_name: Bores Arce, Ainhoa creators_name: López- García, Sergio creators_name: Ibañez, Enrique creators_name: Serrano, Carlos creators_name: Mainer-Pardos, Elena creators_id: creators_id: carlos.lago@uneatlantico.es creators_id: ainhoa.bores@uneatlantico.es creators_id: creators_id: creators_id: creators_id: title: Validity of a new tracking device for futsal match ispublished: pub subjects: uneat_dp divisions: uneatlantico_produccion_cientifica full_text_status: none keywords: inertial measurement unit; acceleration; max speed; metrics; team sports abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to to evaluate the validity of a new IMU device that allows measuring different actions in futsal real game situations. Methods: 10 high elite futsal players performed a typical futsal training task, this is, a 4v4 in 28x20m with a duration of 180 seconds, where players worn two tracking devices, the new one (OLIVER) and the already validated device (WIMU). Data recorded by the OLIVER and WIMU PRO systems were compared after the training process. Descriptive analysis was performed for each variable, and a one-way ANOVA was developed to calculate the validity of OLIVER compared with WIMU report. Results: The results reported good validity for most of the variables analyzed, such as total distance, distance covered in different splits, as well as number of accelerations and decelerations and maximal speed (P > .05). However, distance covered at low velocity (0-6 km/h) and high acceleration quantity (>2m/s2) reported statistical differences from OLIVER to WIMU. Conclusion: The OLIVER system can be stated as a valid technology for monitoring external load in specific training tasks in futsal, which ensures an improvement in the monitoring training process date: 2023-12 publication: Acta kinesiologica number: N2 202 id_number: doi:10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.2.3 refereed: TRUE issn: 1840-2976 official_url: http://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2023.17.2.3 access: open language: en citation: Artículo Materias > Educación física y el deporte Universidad Europea del Atlántico > Investigación > Producción Científica Abierto Inglés Purpose: The purpose of this study was to to evaluate the validity of a new IMU device that allows measuring different actions in futsal real game situations. Methods: 10 high elite futsal players performed a typical futsal training task, this is, a 4v4 in 28x20m with a duration of 180 seconds, where players worn two tracking devices, the new one (OLIVER) and the already validated device (WIMU). Data recorded by the OLIVER and WIMU PRO systems were compared after the training process. Descriptive analysis was performed for each variable, and a one-way ANOVA was developed to calculate the validity of OLIVER compared with WIMU report. Results: The results reported good validity for most of the variables analyzed, such as total distance, distance covered in different splits, as well as number of accelerations and decelerations and maximal speed (P > .05). However, distance covered at low velocity (0-6 km/h) and high acceleration quantity (>2m/s2) reported statistical differences from OLIVER to WIMU. Conclusion: The OLIVER system can be stated as a valid technology for monitoring external load in specific training tasks in futsal, which ensures an improvement in the monitoring training process metadata Uribarria, Héctor Gadea; Lago-Fuentes, Carlos; Bores Arce, Ainhoa; López- García, Sergio; Ibañez, Enrique; Serrano, Carlos y Mainer-Pardos, Elena mail SIN ESPECIFICAR, carlos.lago@uneatlantico.es, ainhoa.bores@uneatlantico.es, SIN ESPECIFICAR, SIN ESPECIFICAR, SIN ESPECIFICAR, SIN ESPECIFICAR (2023) Validity of a new tracking device for futsal match. Acta kinesiologica (N2 202). ISSN 1840-2976